Loading ...
IPCC Hoax
The UN sponsored IPCC report that claims Global Warming is man-made has 2,500 scientist is a hoax. Only because the were pressured, the UN has finally released comments from the reviewers. (LINK)
A total of 308 reviewers commented on the SOR, but only 32 reviewers commented on more than three chapters and only five reviewers commented on all 11 chapters of the report. Only about half the reviewers commented on more than one chapter. It is logical that reviewers would generally limit their comments to their areas of expertise but it’s a far cry from the idea of thousands of scientists agreeing to anything.
So of the 2,500 scientiest, most of them only commented on their area of expertise…ot on global warming.
An example of rampant misrepresentation of IPCC reports is the frequent assertion that “hundreds of IPCC scientists†are known to support the following statement, arguably the most important of the WG I report, namely “Greenhouse gas forcing has very likely caused most of the observed global warming over the last 50 yearsâ€.
In total, only 62 scientists reviewed the chapter in which this statement appears, the critical chapter 9, “Understanding and Attributing Climate Changeâ€. Of the comments received from the 62 reviewers of this critical chapter, almost 60 per cent of them were rejected by IPCC editors. And of the 62 expert reviewers of this chapter, 55 had serious vested interest, leaving only seven expert reviewers who appear impartial.
Two of these seven were contacted by NRSP for the purposes of this article – Dr Vincent Gray of New Zealand and Dr Ross McKitrick of the University of Guelph, Canada. Concerning the “Greenhouse gas forcing …†statement above, Professor McKitrick explained “A categorical summary statement like this is not supported by the evidence in the IPCC WG I report. Evidence shown in the report suggests that other factors play a major role in climate change, and the specific effects expected from greenhouse gases have not been observed.â€
Dr Gray labeled the WG I statement as “Typical IPCC doubletalk†asserting “The text of the IPCC report shows that this is decided by a guess from persons with a conflict of interest, not from a tested modelâ€.
The Global Warminging scare mongers are in trouble. Their main talking point is a hoax.
